Two weeks ago, on February 17th, 2012, I posted a discussion about the Sound Frequency Repatterning by Chloe Faith Wordsworth. This repatterning appears in her Transforming Chakra Patterns with Resonance Repatterning manual.
Here is a comment that group member Carol Cannon posted in response to the article. Thank you for posting it Carol, for it reminded me that I need to add more information to the mix.
Thank you, Meryl,
For having the patience to articulate this problem and I would really like to hear from Chloe as to the mechanics of her instructions. It is clear enough by the contents of the repatterning about the significance of these notes and frequencies, but it is in following the instructions on this wheel that does not result in illuminating the sought after knowledge. Can we pose the question directly to Chloe for her comments?
Thank you so much,
Carol
On to the additional information. On page 105 , d. in the new book Chloe has added something new to the instructions for obtaining the “mid-point note”. After describing the process of converging two fingers so that you are left on one “piece of the pie” she states “(Sometimes it is the ‘line’ or frequency between two notes. In this case you will muscle check). I believe that this means you will muscle check whether to use the top or bottom note as the mid-point note.
But again, as stated in the February 17th posting, we are only looking to see whether or not there is any added significance or meaning to be gleaned from a correlation between a mid-point note and the disharmonious note which is the the frequency of the problem. If there is a correlation then a specific perspective can be added to our understanding of the problem.
The information above also pertains to the combined parental note on the same page.
In the new version of this repatterning there is a reworking of old book, page 78 what was F.(mcs) We need to identify the personal correlation for the note? What is called the personal correlation here is viewing the disharmonious note of the problem and seeing the intrinsic coherent /positive quality of that particular note.
In the new version, on new book page 106 I. Identify the coherent response to the opportunity of the problem This is the note of the problem identified in {C}, the meaning of the former terminology “personal correlation” has been clarified.
This shift in our understanding leads us to a new section in the new book on page 107, J. (mcs) We need to identify the coherent octave of the opportunity of the note (as identified in I)? What we are asked to do in this part is identical to what we used to do when we were finding the octave of the harmonious note anywhere in the RR system.
The terminology has been altered and what we are asked to do here is simply (mcs) for the specific cycles per second frequency number of the coherent octave of the ‘problem’ note that is now being viewed as a new frequency of opportunity, and then *[cr] the client for that number of cycles per second, as is presented on the familiar octave frequency tables.
I hope that these discoveries are helpful to all of us who are using the new material. Please let me know and let’s continue the discussion!
Meryl Chodosh-Weiss 